In this blog, I reflect on my learnings from the PgCert workshop on teaching artefacts. For this workshop, I chose the Assessment Brief for the Research Proposal unit which I teach across MA courses at LCF. The Unit exposes the students to a wide range of methodologies and methods and supports them in designing their Masters research projects. At the end of the Unit, they are required to write a proposal for their Masters projects, outlining their aim and objectives, contextualising their research, explaining their methodological choices, and including their ethics forms. The Assessment Brief informs the students about the Learning Outcomes (Enquiry, Knowledge, Process, Communication, and Realisation), and the holistic type of the formative assessment, amongst other important elements of the Unit.
Based on feedback I received, I will add hyperlinks to previous years’ examples into the Assessment Brief. I may also invite ex-students to share their experiences, and introduce informal open days for current students to receive feedback on their work in progress. I was also inspired to move to holistic assessment and ask the students to submit not only an essay but also a portfolio documenting their research process and critical reflection on the suitability of different research methods to their projects. I also liked the suggestion to co-design the assessment by inviting others (e.g. Course Leader and External Examiner) into the formative assessment.
The group discussion also reminded me of the importance to think about the individual student journey, but also to add some points for exchange amongst students. Padlet or blogs could be used to help students use their experiences as a starting point for their personalised learning journeys, to then define the research problem they want to focus on and write their own project briefs. It would be interesting to test the brief by gathering feedback from relevant industry professionals as potential future employers. I was also reminded of the importance to simplify the jargon of the brief, present it at the initial lecture, and add a glossary of terms to unpack key concepts; this is something I have already worked on. A good practice would also be to add visuals or a video explaining the learning outcomes. In fact, as highlighted by John Biggs in his book “Teaching for Quality Learning at University” (2003), it is fundamental that students know what they have to do in a course, and this can be ensured not only by framing clear learning outcomes, but also through briefings, meetings, and other supportive learning scenarios.